If an act or an omission constitutes an offense solely when dedicated by a person possessing a specific qualification or quality, or vested with a selected authority or performing in a particular capability, an accused charged with such an offense upon a charge alleging that he possessed such qualification or quality or was vested with such authority or was acting in such capability, shall, at criminal proceedings, be deemed to have included such stuff or high quality or to have been vested with such authority or to have been performing in such capacity on the time of the fee of the offense, unless the such allegation is at any time during the criminal proceedings expressly denied by the accused or is disproved.
Any particular person who’s the holder of the mandatory authority and who fails without reasonable cause to provide such control instantly to the specific person making the demand beneath subsection 2 for the manufacturing thereof or who fails without good cause to submit such authority to an individual and at a spot and inside such affordable time as the individual making the demand might specify, shall be guilty of an offense and liable on conviction to a superb not exceeding R300 or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding three months. Any peace officer, aside from a police officer in uniform, and any particular person authorized under paragraph a shall, when demanding the necessary authority from any person, produce, on the request of that person, his power to make the demand.
If the person involved is not in custody, the said decide, or judicial officer shall determine the time when and the place where the person concerned shall seem earlier than the mentioned magistrate. He shall, after that, for all functions, be deemed to have been summoned when it comes to section 211 of the said Act to seem earlier than the said magistrate on the time singapore pools soccer odds and place so decided. If in any court, throughout the trial of a person who’s charged with an offense aside from a crime referred to in part 18, it appears to the decision or judicial officer presiding on the trial that such individual might be a person as is described in section 211 of the Prevention and Remedy of Drug Dependency Act, 1992 in this section referred to because the mentioned Act, the decide or judicial officer could, with the consent of the prosecutor given after consultation with a social worker as outlined in part 1 of the said Act, stop the trial and order that an inquiry is held when it comes to part 22 of the said Act in respect of the individual involved by a magistrate as outlined in section 1 of the said Act and indicated in the order.